Check the latest UofT COVID-19 updates more information
Working paper 286
Martin J. Osborne and Matthew A. Turner, "Cost benefit analysis vs. referenda", 2007-04-13
Main Text (application/pdf) (252,672 bytes)

Abstract: We consider a planner who chooses between two possible public policies and ask whether a referendum or a cost benefit analysis leads to higher welfare. We find that a referendum leads to higher welfare than a cost benefit analyses in "common value" environments. Cost benefit analysis is better in "private value" environments.

Keywords: Cost benefit analysis, elections, referenda, project evaluation

JEL Classification: H43; H11; Q51

Last updated on July 12, 2012