Topic 2: Asset Market Equilibrium


We now turn to the second condition of small open economy equilibrium---that desired holdings of assets equal actual holdings. Domestic output is a flow of returns from the domestically employed human and physical capital stock. Ownership of this capital stock represents rights to receive the income flows from it---such ownership claims are called assets. Another asset present in the economy is the real stock of money. The income flow from money is the additional amounts of consumption and investment goods that can be produced because human and physical capital resources do not have to be tied up making transactions that can be more cheaply made by simply exchanging money.

Domestic residents' stock of wealth is the aggregate stock of assets they own---the sum total of their ownership of human capital, physical capital, and real money balances. Often, of course, a particular individual's ownership of these primary assets is indirect. Instead of holding capital goods, she may hold a bond, stock, or other piece of paper signifying an obligation of the person or institution issuing the paper to redirect income flows from directly held capital to the holder of that paper.

Individuals are free to adjust the mix of different types of assets in their portfolios by exchanging assets for money. When they have the desired mix of assets of various types in their portfolios, they are in a situation of portfolio equilibrium. Since human capital is typically embodied in its owner, it cannot be bought and sold, apart from conditions where slavery is present. Non-human assets, however, will be exchanged until portfolio equilibrium occurs. At that point people will have the desired mix of money and non-monetary assets in their portfolios.

Domestic residents are in asset or portfolio equilibrium when they have no desire to exchange non-monetary assets for each other or for money. It turns out that, given free exchange of non-human capital assets, all that is necessary for this to happen is that the aggregate quantity of money demanded equal the quantity in circulation. Given one's overall level of wealth, which is fixed by previous decisions to save rather than consume, a willingness to hold one's existing stock of money is equivalent to a willingess to hold one's stock of non-monetary assets. An excess demand for money must have as its counterpart an excess supply of non-monetary assets and vice versa.

The condition of aggregate portfolio equilibrium is thus a very simple one---that the demand for real money balances in the economy equal the supply. Behind the scenes, of course, the existing mix of non-monetary assets held must equal the mix that asset holders desire to hold---such asset-mix issues stay in the background as long as we think of non-monetary asset holdings as an aggregate quantity and assume for analytical purposes that there is a single domestic interest rate.

The supply of money in circulation is ultimately determined by the government's monetary policy. The question then is: What determines the demand for real money holdings? Since money is held to facilitate making transactions, the amount of it demanded will clearly depend on the volume of transactions being made which will, in turn, depend on the level of income. We would expect that the higher the level of income, the greater the real stock of money people and organizations will choose to hold. Note that we refer here to real rather than nominal money holdings. The reason is that the usefulness of any given stock of dollar balances for making transactions will be less, the higher are the prices that have to be paid to buy and sell the items being exchanged. So a rise in the price level will reduce the usefulness of money in proportion---what counts is the stock of money measured in units of output, not in dollars, pounds, or whatever the currency unit is.

The quantity of real money holdings demanded will also depend on the cost of holding money instead of other assets. If one has to give up a lot of earnings from other assets to hold an additional unit of money, it will pay to hold less real money balances and use a bit more labour and capital in making transactions. The higher the interest rate on non-monetary assets, therefore, the smaller will be the quantity of money demanded. To the extent that one can earn interest on money by holding it as an interest-earning savings deposit, this cost will be reduced. But interest is never earned on pocket cash and rarely on chequing or savings account balances.

How can a transactor substitute labor and capital resources for money in making transactions? Essentially by holding a smaller inventory of money balances and running the risk of not having enough cash to pay bills. A short-fall of cash generates interest costs of temporarily borrowing funds and/or time and service costs of making phone calls, selling securities, and transferring funds. If the interest foregone by holding cash is great enough, it will be worth risking and bearing these transactions costs.

It should be noted here that it is the nominal interest rate on other assets, not the real rate, that represents the cost of holding non-interest-bearing money. The nominal interes rate, it will be recalled from the module entitled Interest Rates and Asset Values, is equal to the real rate of interest plus the expected rate of inflation. Since high inflation erodes the real value of money holdings by reducing the amount of goods those money balances will buy in the future, the expected rate of inflation must be added to the real interest rate that can be earned on non-monetary assets in calculating the cost of holding money.

The demand for money can thus be expressed as

    1.    (M/P)d  =  γ  −  θ i  +  εY

where  M  is the nominal money stock,  (M/P)d  is desired real money holdings,   i   is the nominal interest rate and  Y  is the level of output and income produced by domestically employed resources. An increase in the level of income or a reduction in the nominal interest rate increases the real quantity of money demanded. A fall in the nominal interest rate can occur through a fall in the world real interest rate or a fall in the expected rate of domestic inflation.

Aggregate domestic asset or portfolio equilibrium occurs when

    2.    M/P  =  (M/P)d 

so the condition of stock or asset equilibrium becomes

    3.    M/P  =  γ  − θ ( r*  +  τ ) +  ε Y 

where  r*  is the real domestic interest rate determined by conditions in the world capital market, the risk of holding domestic assets and the expected appreciation of those assets resulting from any expected appreciation of the domestic real exchange rate, and  τ  is the expected rate of domestic inflation.

This condition must be combined with the condition of flow or real goods market equilibrium outlined in the previous topic to obtain the overall equilibrium of the small open economy. The condition of real goods market equilibrium is reproduced here as Equation 4.

    4.    Y  = ( a  +  δ  +  ΦBT  +  DSB)/(s + m) −  μ/(s + m) r*  +  m* /(s + m) Y*  −  σ/(s + m) Q

where it will be recalled that  s  and  m  are the domestic marginal propensities to save and import and  Q  is the domestic real exchange rate. The domestic nominal interest rate is given by conditions in the world as a whole together with past movements in the relevant domestic variables. And income will be fixed at its full-employment level when the the domestic resources are fully employed with the price level being fixed when there is less than full employment. Accordingly, when the nominal exchange rate is flexible the above two equations must be solved simultaneously to produce the equilibrium levels of the endogenous variables  Y  and  Q  under less-than-full-employment conditions and  P  and  Q  under conditions of full employment.

The natural way to understand this equilibrium is to put the two equations on a diagram as separate curves and find the spot where they cross. But what variables should we put on the two axes? We portrayed income-expenditure equilibrium in the previous lesson, The Balance of Payments and the Exchange Rate, by putting the real exchange rate or income on one axis and the real current account balance (net lending) on the other. And in the previous topic of this current lesson we portrayed income-expenditure equilibrium it by putting desired expenditure on the vertical axis and income on the horizontal one. Unfortunately, neither of these graphings can be usefully extended to incorporate asset equilibrium. This leads directly to our next topic.

It is time for a test. Make sure you have thought up your own answers before looking at the ones provided.

Question 1
Question 2

Choose Another Topic in the Lesson